“The problem of prosperity”
Published Sunday, September 16, 2007
Build It
Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Palm Beach County and other similarly
blessed places around the nation are suffering from what some have
called “the problem of prosperity.”
Put another way, it’s also been called “last one in
close the door.”
OK. Fine. Palm Beach County is a great place to live.
But the folks who do something other than clip coupons, or who
are otherwise not saddled with work, per se, can no longer afford
to live here. The problem is, and with meteoric rises in both land
and home costs, there is virtually no place left for those who must
actually work for a living, to in fact live.
Teachers, fire fighters policeman and health care workers are among
many others who are finding it less and less attractive to live
and work in Palm Beach County because it, quite simply, is not affordable
--- and those people are leaving the county in significant numbers.
How significant?
In Florida as a whole the net migration continues to be positive
- with about 1,900 people a day moving in, and about 970 a day moving
out. And that's right through the end of 2006, and despite the harrowing
2004-05 hurricane season.
However, it’s only necessary to point at one number to know
the depth of the problem in South Florida. For the first time in
more than a quarter of a century, Palm Beach County saw a decline
in school enrollment in 2006.
There are in fact real estate companies on Florida’s west
coast that deal specifically and only with people trying to escape
South Florida.
The principle culprit is the lack of affordable - so-called “workforce
housing.”
Workforce housing, indeed, affordable housing of any kind is no
longer merely a rhetorical question. If such housing is not provided,
and provided both systematically and in large quantities in the
next 20 years, then Palm Beach County is going to suffer lower and
lower quality public and private services, because less and less
qualified people will be willing to undergo long, daily commutes.
This is not about the public housing of old --- the “projects”
that were doomed to fail because what collectivized housing accomplished
was only a gathering together of large groups of people with the
same need --- jobs and, absent jobs, then more tax dollars.
The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Deveopment (HUD) foisted
the muiti-billion dollar boondoggle of public housing upon us when
the strength of this nation was always finding the best and the
brightest among us to fulfill our needs through rewards of the free
enterprise system.
One of the ways to do that is through organizations like Habitat
for Humanity, and a variety of other groups who understand that
we need to create the pride and pleasure of affordable single-family
home availability.
Habitat and groups like it need financial help. However, the state
is already collecting billions in money supposedly designed to fund
affordable housing but these monies (document stamp taxes) are being
shuffled into the general fund, even while affordable housing budgets
are being cut.
These monies need to be used for the intended legislative purpose.
Build affordable housing, and quality public and private employees
will come, and will stay.
Boca Raton’s long-range plan of inter-modal transportation
providing greater incentive for workforce housing west of the city
remains an attractive idea - but one that doesn’t seem to
have major political weight behind it - yet.
That, and other approaches to workforce housing need to be realistically
and seriously examined
Doing anything else is pennywise and pound foolish.
Sid’s Right
Leave it to County GOP Chairman Sid Dinerstein. Just when you think
you have him pegged as a hidebound, died in the wool denouncers
of all thing Democratic, he goes and commits a rationality.
Asked by this newspaper what he thought of Senator Bill Nelson’s
(that’s large D, Democrat Senator Bill Nelson’s) ideas
about election primary reform, Dinerstein said, “Clearly the
Senator is on to something.”
Here’s Nelson’s plan: six presidential primary dates,
one in March, two in April, two in May and one in June. Each contest
would feature at least one state from each of six different geographic
regions. The order of states within each region would rotate every
four years.
“This would give voters in larger states a strong voice in
selecting the nominees over four months, while also giving citizens
in the smaller states a fair say, too,” said Nelson.
“And if we accept the fact that the primary system is both
broken and fluid, then the Nelson proposal is a change for the better
and ought to be looked at,” Dinerstein said.
Question now is: will Boca Raton Republican Club President Yvonne
Boice now allow Sid back into those gatherings?
Of course she will -- because the system is broken, and Sid’s
right.
|